Pink Tape

A BLOG FROM THE FAMILY BAR

...in which I ricochet from too serious to too flippant and where I may vent, rant or wax lyrical at my own whim, mostly about family law. Constructive co-ranting welcome. More...

Looked After – A Childhood in Care

It's been a while since I've managed a book review. Because I'm always too absorbed in the job. I bought this book a couple of months ago, having read a review somewhere, and have been carrying it around in my backpack ever since. Unopened, naturally. There is always something more important. Last Saturday was spent travelling to our holiday location in France. On Sunday I sat under a palm tree and read this book in one sitting. I wept all the way through. That possibly tells you something about how much I needed a holiday, but it tells you more about the power of this book. We do this job because we care about the children at the heart of the system. but we sometimes (often) become disconnected from the reality. Partly to cope, and partly because for most of us in the job our lived experience is nothing like the experience of a child in care (care experienced lawyers are few and far between). Whilst we need our protective shell to survive, sometimes its important to reconnect with...

read more

The ramblings of an old woman

The other day I was trawling back through very old Pink Tape posts looking for something I thought I'd written back in 2009. I was struck by how often I was writing on this blog, at at time when I was between babies and back at work. In one month there were about 20 posts. They were mostly short and sarcastic single issue observations on some piece of news, and many of them are difficult to understand as the linked material is no longer available, but it's a reminder of how the rhythm of life changes over time. Now, as I am on the last straights of my unhappy approach to my half centenial, and freshly back from yet another doctor's appointment where I am poked and prodded and generally made to feel as if every ailment or ache is just an inevitable consequence of my near geriatric status, I write less often but (I hope) in a more considered way. At any rate my posts tend these days to be longer and more in depth. My lifelong struggle to live 'less is more' continues. I aspire to the...

read more

Resolution Podcast – Joshua Rozenberg, transparency – what’s not to like?

Ok, well it also features yours truly wibbling on about her pet topic again, but I'd like to think this episode of the excellent Resolution Podcast is interesting nonetheless. It was certainly fun to record, and Joshua as SUCH a total pro, reeling off all those on point quotes that he had ready at his fingertips. Anyway, if you ARE a tiny bit anxious about reporters turning up in your court hearings, do listen. I hope you will find it reassuring. There are some useful signposts to materials in the show notes. Thanks to Resolution for devoting an episode to the topic. https://open.spotify.com/episode/2FfSs3MSLRSzn0QdN3REvd

read more

Controversial Suspected Inflicted Head Injuries pilot launched: Lawyers raise concern about lack of consultation and potential unfairness

To all care lawyers: There is an important post on The Transparency Project telling you about a new pilot that is running in Head Injury cases in Birmingham Sheffield and Manchester. When I say new, apparently its been live since April, not that anybody has been properly informed before launch, or even consulted on the design. As you will see from the article, and the linked pieces in the Gazette and Local Government Lawyer, there is huge concern being expressed by big hitters in head injury cases, that this will cause potential injustice to families (such as wrongful permanent removal and adoption) and / or will just be counterproductive of the scheme's aims to reduce delay and cost. Reducing delay is of course in the interests of families - these cases take far too long and the wait is agnonising. But no parent wants the wrong outcome quickly. They'd far rather have the right outcome done slowly. And we might reasonably assume that the wishes and feelings of children would be...

read more

Pay what you owe or talk to the hand (what’s a Hadkinson order when it’s at home?)

  The case of BR v SN provides an unusual example of court proactively controlling litigation about child arrangements against a backdrop of pretty relentless litigation, appeals and a failure to comply with orders made.   After many earlier stages in the litigation between the parents, in 2023 the father had made an application for the child to live with him. That application was to be heard by Her Honour Judge O’Neill. However, HHJ O’Neill decided that she would deploy the little used power to make a Hadkinson order, which had the effect of blocking the proceedings. The appeal judgment of Moor J tells us the background to that order being made, and why the father’s appeal against it was allowed. However, the reason the appeal was allowed was not because such an order could never be justified, but because of an important misstep by HHJ O'Neil that undermined her decision. And if you read on you will see that HHJ O’Neill was largely vindicated in her approach,...

read more

About this blog

“Pink Tape” isn’t just about family law. I post about topics that interest me, which mostly revolve around family law, but also include non-legal family-related topics as well as unrelated subjects. I hope this blog will convince at least one person that not all of us in the legal profession are money-hungry sharks. Some of us are actually quite nice. Additionally, I aim to provide useful information about family law for those working in the field without being too heavy or boring.

The primary goal of the blog is to improve the quality of public information and discussions about legal issues.

I understand that not everyone is a fan of “Pink Tape” or family lawyers in general.

latest

Blog Posts

New Templates

Last autumn I was a bit mardy about the template orders when it came to their attempt to warn litigants about the rules around confidentiality. https://www.pinktape.co.uk/rants/you-draft-fool/ I should have got around to politely raising my concerns with the committee...

The princess and the podcast

Still adjusting to everyone assuming I'm a fancy pants... My pants are - in fact - still a slightly off white / grey because I, like most other humans, am apparently unable to run a load of whites without a rogue sock getting in. I do have actual new blog posts up my...

Does QLR stand for Quite Literally Ridiculous?

Since I last wrote about the emerging issues with implementation of the QLR regime I have continued to receive ridiculous emails on a regular basis, in spite of having provided my contact details ONLY for the purposes of bookings at courts local to me. It's getting a...

The trans debate (no, not that one)

Sorry. Cheap headline, it's not about that. Been talking to a mate about transcripts. Yeah, that's how we lawyers roll. We were pondering the judgment of Lord Justice Peter Jackson in M (A Child: Leave to Oppose Adoption) [2023] EWCA Civ 404. Ostensibly it's (another)...

Free Copies of The Family Court Without a Lawyer 4th Edition

UPDATE: Have woken up to an inbox full of requests and all copies are now allocated. Off to the post office with them shortly.   I've had a box of copies of the 4th edition of my book sitting in my office for an age, waiting for me to think up the best way to...

Two little letters

I feel I should mark the milestone of my appointment as King's Counsel on Pink Tape, the blog which has been a sort of companion throughout most of my legal career to date (including that time when The Times wrongly mistook me for Queen's Counsel, a decade too early)....

There may be trouble ahead…

You might think that no news is good news. And that since the Qualified Legal Representatives ('QLR') scheme has been in force for 8 months, the comparative invisibility of it must mean its all bedding in nicely. Actually, it's just bedding in verrrrrry slowly. I am...

“I want” doesn’t get

Interesting example of how not to successfully apply for disclosure of information from the family court here, in Thames Valley Police v Ms F & Anor [2023] EWFC 28. A police force sought disclosure of material from family proceedings in the course of investigating...

Rules of the blog

Anonymized or fictional

All the information on this blog is anonymized or fictional to avoid causing any trouble for anyone, including myself. I have modified details to prevent the identification of specific cases.

Comments

 I won’t approve comments that, in my judgment, breach privacy laws related to family matters. Unless individuals have been identified in a published judgment, I won’t disclose their involvement in any proceedings.

Nothing Defamatory

 I will not post anything that I believe could be considered defamatory. Due to time constraints, I can’t fact-check every statement in a comment. Therefore, I must be cautious to prevent potential legal issues or threatening letters. If you’re certain that a comment is not defamatory, you can publish it elsewhere at your own risk.

NOT Legal Advice

The content of this blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, so please don’t interpret it as such. It may seem relevant to your situation, but it likely isn’t. I cannot be held responsible for any reliance you place on its contents.

Accuracy

The information on the blog is as accurate and up to date as possible, considering my other commitments. Pink Tape is a hobby that I work on when time allows. Therefore, I can’t cover all legal changes or update information that becomes outdated.

External Links

I cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites linked from this blog, in terms of their accuracy or the opinions expressed on them

Moderation

I’ve implemented comment moderation on this blog to filter out comments that are repeatedly negative or offensive about lawyers. Rest assured, I won’t block sensible contributions, even if they disagree with me. I will strive to moderate promptly, but occasionally a comment may get lost in spam.

Right of Reply

If a post contains an inaccuracy about you and you’d like it corrected, feel free to comment for a right of reply. Please respect that the content on this blog is my intellectual property, and ask for permission before reposting. If you have any topics or blog post suggestions, feel free to email me at familoo@pinktape.co.uk.

Copyright

All material on this site is copyright of Lucy Reed. Please do not reproduce without permission.