‘What went wrong’ – are we asking ourselves the right questions?
Some commentary I've heard and read in the wake of the murder of Sara Sharif features the familiar questions that have been asked after so many other child deaths - 'What went wrong? And 'Why does this keep happening?' This post is only concerned with the role of the Family Court. It doesn't consider what happened after the Family Court was last involved in 2019, and the role of other agencies such as the school and social services - there are lots of good questions about that, but those are for another day and another blog post. So what about †he Family Court? Some people clearly think its self evident from the basic facts that something went wrong: the Family Court knew there were allegations against him, approved her placement with him and now she's dead. Ergo, something went wrong. Of course, it isn't actually that simple. In his 'anonymous judge' judgment arising from the media's application to access documents from the Family Court relating to decisions made about Sara and her...
The alienating guidance has landed. Take me to your guidance document
In a moment of pre-Christmas over-exuberance, Zoe Saunders and I decided it would be a good idea to harness the last dregs of our 2024 energy and deploy them in the preparation of a podcast episode all about the much awaited alienating behaviours guidance, which had just been published. And then I got distracted by Christmas and forgot to post about it. So, slightly belatedly, here is our podcast episode about the Family Justice Council's recently published guidance on alienating behaviours (full title : Guidance on responding to a child’s unexplained reluctance, resistance or refusal to spend time with a parent and allegations of alienating behaviour). The Guidance is very interesting and I think likely to be helpful in many respects. Other views are available. You can find out more about the St John's Chambers podcast and our team of barristers here.
Life is like a Christmas Fridge…
I have lain in bed for much of the first day of 2025, pretending to be on the verge of taking a shower, and pondering what to make of it. An inauspicious start to a year that I fear is going to be another complicated one chez nous. I have been doom scrolling crochet memes and pondering how to approach 2024. I am still smarting from my 50th birthday and feeling my age, and the events of 2024 have reminded me of my own mortality. Perhaps it's the Christmas booze, but I keep daydreaming about the many ways in which life is like a Christmas fridge, which one day someone will unceremoniously unplug. The only resolution I've managed to make before dusk on day 1 is that I will write a blog post about why life is like a Christmas fridge. I'm regretting that already. I could have resolved to give up booze, stop eating food rich in carbs and fat and todo more exercise. But unfortunately my fridge is like a Christmas fridge and my wine rack is like a Christmas wine rack, and I can't let it go...
What a week
Well. It's been a week, hasn't it? It's Friday night and I'm holed up in my office-cum-santa's-grotto (one has to forge a path through the amazon boxes to reach the desk) contemplating life and everything family law related this Friday evening....the teenagers have taken over the common space and I don't want to cramp their style. It's rare to see them socialising, so I am happy to hear them down the hall messing about while I decompress from the week. So I thought I'd knock out a blog post. I feel as if things have been zooming across the top of my inbox and news feed all week and it's been hard to keep up. Here are the things that have stuck with me. You will forgive me if I don't bother with links or references. I'm sure you can find the things I'm referring to with the help of google (if you haven't seen them already). We've had the new alienating behaviours guidance from the FJC. A long wait, and much better in final form than the draft I saw last year, which was a bit all over...
The Law Show
I had to get up at 5.30am to make it to the studio to record The Law Show for BBC Radio 4. I was somewhat sleep deprived anyway as a result of having a hurty leg over the weekend (don't laugh it's been excruciating). I woke groggy from some interesting new medication with no idea where my respectable clothes were. And so it seemed reasonable to dress, as they say, for radio. Only they had CAMERAS. Goddamnit. Fortunately, they didn't spot any hot takes that they wanted to show a clip of. So you will never know how quite how rough I looked. In fact I don't even know why I'm confessing this here. Anyway, I had intended to post something here in advance of the show airing and failed dismally to remember, but lucky for you it's still available on BBC Sounds and is re-airing next Tues evening at 9pm. So, fill your boots. The Law Show - on family courts. Me, Sanchia Berg, Samantha Woodham and host Dr Joelle Grogan. Hopefully a bit informative and interesting. Watch here.
About this blog
“Pink Tape” isn’t just about family law. I post about topics that interest me, which mostly revolve around family law, but also include non-legal family-related topics as well as unrelated subjects. I hope this blog will convince at least one person that not all of us in the legal profession are money-hungry sharks. Some of us are actually quite nice. Additionally, I aim to provide useful information about family law for those working in the field without being too heavy or boring.
The primary goal of the blog is to improve the quality of public information and discussions about legal issues.
I understand that not everyone is a fan of “Pink Tape” or family lawyers in general.
latest
Blog Posts
The value of nothing – why is the solution always a committee?
I've spent some time wrangling the weeds and the invasive species in my garden this bank holiday weekend. Digging out a giant bamboo that I once used to fill an inconvenient hole in my border and which has now formed an underground network of shoots that has taken...
“Paedophiles to lose parental rights” – but what does that actually mean?
[UPDATE - there is an update at the end of this post] Last week, I found myself unexpectedly recording an episode of BBC Newscast with Sanchia Berg and Harriet Harman MP. The prompt for the episode was a reform to legislation proposed by Harriet Harman, supported by...
Please don’t confuse your ‘usual practice’ with my actual reading of the actual rules
Alright you slackers, it's time for some law. Mainly because I have had a bunch of browser windows open with 'new' judgments open, ready for me to write them up and I can't tick them off my to do list until I do. I could just close the browser windows but that would...
What are we doing with our lives?
I've been cautious about posting anything recently. My head is awl of a muddle and I may say something I will later regret. But I've got itchy fingers and am sitting quietly at home with nobody to distract me, so... I should be at work this week. In fact I should be...
I have run out of vases
Trigger warning: death. My mum died last week. Her name was Suzanne (never Susan). I realised as I studied her face after it happened that I have never seen a dead body before. Her top lip was taut over her teeth. She looked weirdly waxen. Her forehead was cool...
What my out of office really means…
The other day I put a polite but hopefully firm OOO on my emails, explaining that I am not taking on new work and will deal only with emails relating to existing commitments. This morning I seriously contemplated rewording it to simply read: "For the love of god,...
Two more books, still working on that novel…
Hot on the heels of the second edition of Transparency in the Family Courts, released last week, I received these beauties in the post today. The Public Law Dictionary is a new addition to this family of dictionaries, and I am one of the authors. Other titles include...
Transparency in the Family Courts – Publicity and Privacy in Practice
I'm please to say that the Second Edition of our book Transparency in the Family Court - Publicity and Privacy in Practice is now available for pre-order from Bloomsbury Professional Press for £85. This time around it comes in a fetching shade of pond green. As you...
In defence of tit for tat
I've been blessed with some lovely cooperative and charming opponents recently. And few who have been grouchy, rude and irrational. I'm a firm believer that being that person doesn't pay off: it isn't an effective strategy that assists clients. It signals a loss of...
Rules of the blog
Anonymized or fictional
All the information on this blog is anonymized or fictional to avoid causing any trouble for anyone, including myself. I have modified details to prevent the identification of specific cases.
Comments
I won’t approve comments that, in my judgment, breach privacy laws related to family matters. Unless individuals have been identified in a published judgment, I won’t disclose their involvement in any proceedings.
Nothing Defamatory
I will not post anything that I believe could be considered defamatory. Due to time constraints, I can’t fact-check every statement in a comment. Therefore, I must be cautious to prevent potential legal issues or threatening letters. If you’re certain that a comment is not defamatory, you can publish it elsewhere at your own risk.
NOT Legal Advice
The content of this blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, so please don’t interpret it as such. It may seem relevant to your situation, but it likely isn’t. I cannot be held responsible for any reliance you place on its contents.
Accuracy
The information on the blog is as accurate and up to date as possible, considering my other commitments. Pink Tape is a hobby that I work on when time allows. Therefore, I can’t cover all legal changes or update information that becomes outdated.
External Links
I cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites linked from this blog, in terms of their accuracy or the opinions expressed on them
Moderation
I’ve implemented comment moderation on this blog to filter out comments that are repeatedly negative or offensive about lawyers. Rest assured, I won’t block sensible contributions, even if they disagree with me. I will strive to moderate promptly, but occasionally a comment may get lost in spam.
Right of Reply
If a post contains an inaccuracy about you and you’d like it corrected, feel free to comment for a right of reply. Please respect that the content on this blog is my intellectual property, and ask for permission before reposting. If you have any topics or blog post suggestions, feel free to email me at familoo@pinktape.co.uk.
Copyright
All material on this site is copyright of Lucy Reed. Please do not reproduce without permission.
